| 郭丽云,侯淑芬,戴 红,王兆华,李 玫,刘 洋.北京市残疾人“人人享有康复服务”评价指标体系信度和效度研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,2009,24(2):158~161 |
| 北京市残疾人“人人享有康复服务”评价指标体系信度和效度研究 点此下载全文 |
| 郭丽云 侯淑芬 戴 红 王兆华 李 玫 刘 洋 |
| 山西长治医学院附属和平医院, 046000 |
| 基金项目：北京市残疾人康复工作办公室/北京市残联调研课题基金；北京市哲学社会科学“十一五”规划重点项目（06AaSH0007） |
| DOI： |
| 摘要点击次数: 2392 |
| 全文下载次数: 2037 |
| 摘要： |
| 目的：评价北京市残疾人“人人享有康复服务”评价指标体系的信度和效度。方法：根据指标体系和审评细则，形成两份调查问卷。分别对康复管理人员、残疾人及其亲友进行问卷调查，同时对康复管理专家进行访谈。根据问卷调查和访谈结果对指标体系的内在信度、表面效度和内容效度进行评价。结果：将指标体系的指标分成7组，每组（项）指标的克朗巴赫α系数分别是0.7845、0.5681、0.6086、0.7567、0.6963、0.8266、0.6838，内在一致性信度可以接受。指标体系符合专家和公众的共识和认同，说明其表面效度较好。10个区县得分和排序基本反映了区县的实际康复工作情况；4个区县的残疾人调查的统计分析结果与审评细则中三类地区目标值的高低形成对应，表明指标体系和审评细则具有较好的内容效度。结论：北京市残疾人“人人享有康复服务”评价指标体系和审评细则能够反映北京市各区县康复工作的状况，具有较好的内在信度和内容效度。 |
| 关键词：康复服务 评价指标体系 信度 效度 |
| Reliability and validity for the evaluation index system of rehabilitation services Download Fulltext |
|
| Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Heping Hospital of Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, 046000 |
| Fund Project: |
| Abstract: |
| Objective: To evaluate reliability and validity of the evaluation index system of rehabilitation services. Method: Two questionnaires were transformed from the evaluation indicators and detailed evaluation regulations. People in charge of rehabilitation career and disabled persons were chosen as investigated objects. At the same time, some experts were interviewed. Then, the reliability and validity of the indicator system were confirmed. Result: The indicators of the evaluation indicators system were divided into seven groups. The Cronbach′α coefficient of each group indicators were 0.7845, 0.5681, 0.6086, 0.756, 0.6963, 0.8266 and 0.6838, respectively. The internal consistency reliability was acceptable. The indicator system and detailed evaluation regulations matched the consensus of experts and public, so they had better face validity. The scores and line of 10 districts reflected the circumstance of rehabilitation career. The investigation to disabled persons showed that the statistic result reflected the different target value of three kinds of areas built in the detailed evaluation regulations, which showed that the content validity of the indicator system was fine. Conclusion: The evaluation indicator system can reflect the characteristics of rehabilitation career of different districts in Beijing. It has good reliability and validity. |
| Keywords:rehabilitation services evaluation index system reliability validity |
|
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 |
|
|
|
|
|
