| 付丽敏,崔景辉,冯巨涛.性别与年龄对儿童静态平衡功能影响的定量对比分析[J].中国康复医学杂志,2010,25(3):251~254 |
| 性别与年龄对儿童静态平衡功能影响的定量对比分析 点此下载全文 |
| 付丽敏 崔景辉 冯巨涛 |
| 河北体育学院，河北省石家庄市学府路82号，050041 |
| 基金项目： |
| DOI： |
| 摘要点击次数: 2248 |
| 全文下载次数: 2192 |
| 摘要： |
| 摘要
目的：在定量分析儿童静态平衡的基础上，探讨性别、年龄对儿童静态平衡功能的影响。
方法：采用KY-1112平衡分析系统，对6—8岁254名男童和245名女童,分别在睁、闭眼状态下测试其静态平衡的各项指标。
结果：①6—8岁儿童静态平衡功能性别的比较，在睁眼状态下有3指标差异存在显著性（P<0.05）,在闭眼状态下有3项指标差异存在非常显著性（P<0.01）。②年龄比较，6—8岁儿童静态平衡在5项指标上差异存在显著性(P<0.05)。具体为在指标包络面积（睁闭眼状态下）和轨迹位置均方差（睁眼状态下）上，8岁分别和6岁7岁间存在非常显著性差异（P<0.01），6岁和7岁之间差异无显著性；在指标轨迹长度 (睁闭眼状态下) 上，6岁、7岁、8岁相互间差异存在非常显著性（P<0.01）；这五项有差异指标的均值随着年龄的增大而减小。③指标重心曲线最小矩形长度与宽度的比值小于1。
结论：6—8岁儿童静态平衡功能在性别上差异存在显著性，女童的平衡功能好于男童；在年龄上存在显著性差异，整体趋势是静态平衡功能随着年龄的增大而增强；其重心动摇面积分布为前后大于左右。 |
| 关键词：静态平衡 儿童 性别 年龄 定量分析 |
| Quantitative comparison study of static postural balance of children with different sexes and ages Download Fulltext |
|
| Hebei Institute of Physical Education, Shijiazhuang，050041 |
| Fund Project: |
| Abstract: |
| Abstract
Objective: To explore the influences of different sexes and ages on children static balance at the basis of quantitative comparison study of static postural balance of children aged 6—8(-year-odl).
Method: A total of 499 children aged 6-8-year-old were recruited，which include 254 boys and 245 girls. Static postural balance test of these subjects was performed by using KY-1112 system for stabilometric analysis with subjects opening and closing eyes situations.
Result: ①There was a significant gender difference in static balance. At gender comparison, there was a significant difference on 3 indicators at the situations with eyes opening（P<0.05）, and 3 indicators at the situations with eyes closing(P<0.01).②A significant difference was shown in age comparison on 5 indicators(P<0.05). The mean of 5 indicators decreased with age growing. As compared with the value among Eve Area(with eyes opening and closing) and Track Location Variance(with eyes opening), there was a significant difference between children aged 8-year-old and 6—7-year-old（P<0.01）,and no significant difference between 6-year-old and 7-year-old. There was a very significant difference on the LNG indicators at the situations with eyes opening and closing (P<0.01). ③The value R indicator was less than 1.
Conclusion: To the children aged 6—8-year-old, there was significant gender difference in static balance, the balance function of girls was better than that of boys； there was significant age difference in static balance, with age growing the static balance rose also; relatively speaking， the gravity center shaking area was larger at forward and backward than that at leftward and rightward. |
| Keywords:static balance children gender age quantitative analysis |
|
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 |
