设为首页
加入收藏
联系我们
Email-Alert
 

    首页 | 杂志介绍 | 编委成员 | 投稿指南 | 订阅指南 | 过刊浏览 | 论著模板 | 综述模板 | 帮助

 
王正兴,田学隆.电容耦合电场配合低频脉冲电磁场治疗去势大鼠骨质疏松的实验研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,2015,(3):231~236
电容耦合电场配合低频脉冲电磁场治疗去势大鼠骨质疏松的实验研究    点此下载全文
王正兴  田学隆
重庆大学生物工程学院,重庆,400030
基金项目:重庆市科技攻关计划重点项目(CSTC2010AA5049)
DOI:
摘要点击次数: 1675
全文下载次数: 1856
摘要:
      摘要 目的:探讨电容耦合电场(CCPEF)配合低频脉冲电磁场(PEMFs)对去势大鼠骨质疏松的治疗效果。 方法:选取3月龄的雌性SD大鼠50只,体重(250±20)g,随机分成5组:空白组,对照组,低频脉冲电磁场组(PEMFs),电容耦合电场组(CCPEF),电容耦合电场配合低频脉冲电磁场组(PEMFs+CCPEF)。空白组进行假手术,其余4组制作动物模型。模型完成后4周进行治疗,空白组与对照组:不进行任何刺激;PEMFs组暴露在低频脉冲磁场(15Hz,0.4mT)中,8h/d,连续治疗12周;CCPEF组的刺激频率为1.5MHz,强度为20Vpp,每天1次,每次20min,每周5次,连续治疗11周。PEMFs+CCPEF组:同时进行PEMFs和CCPEF的暴露治疗。 结果:从尿液和血液、子宫系数、生物力学性能数据看出,PEMFs组、CCPEF组、PEMFs+CCPEF组分别与对照组相比较,均具有显著性差异(P<0.05);PEMFs+CCPEF组与PEMFs组、CCPEF组比较,除了Ca、P、ALP参数数据外,其他参数均具有显著性变化(P<0.05)。 结论:电容耦合电场配合低频脉冲电磁场对骨质疏松具有良好的疗效且比其单一的治疗方式效果更佳。
关键词:电容耦合电场  低频脉冲电磁场  骨质疏松症  生物力学性能
Preliminary study on the effect of capacitive-coupled pulsed electric field combined with low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields for osteoporosis    Download Fulltext
College of Bioengineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400030
Fund Project:
Abstract:
      Abstract Objective: To investigate the treatment effect of capacitive-coupled pulsed electric field (CCPEF) combined with low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs) on osteoporosis in ovariectomized rats. Method: Fifty female 3 month aged SD rats, weighing (250±20)g, were chosen and divided into five groups: Blank group, Contrast group, PEMFs group, CCPEF group, PEMFs+CCPEF group. Blank group received sham operation, and other groups were established into are animal models. Four weeks after modeling, the treatments started: Blank group and Contrast group without any stimulation; PEMFs group were exposed in PEMFs (15Hz, 0.4mT), 8h/d, for 12 weeks; CCPEF group were placed in CCPEF (1.5MHz, 20Vpp), 20min/d, 5 times a week, for 11 weeks; PEMFs+CCPEF group exposured in PEMFs and CCPEF simultaneously. Result: From the data of urine and blood, uterine factor and biomechanical performance, PEMFs, CCPEF and PEMFs+CCPEF groups compared with Contrast group, all had significant differences (P<0.05); PEMFs+CCPEF group compared with PEMFs group and CCPEF group, in addition to parameter data of Ca, P, ALP, other parameters all had significant changes (P<0.05). Conclusion: The effect of PEMFs combined with CCPEF on osteoporosis was better than the single treatment.
Keywords:capacitive-coupled pulsed electric field  pulsed electromagnetic field  osteoporosis  biomechanical properties
查看全文  查看/发表评论

您是本站第 37942443 位访问者

版权所有:中国康复医学会
主管单位:中国科学技术协会 主办单位:中国康复医学会
地址:北京市朝阳区樱花园东街,中日友好医院内   邮政编码:100029   电话:010-64218095   

本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计
京ICP备18060696号-2

京公网安备 11010502038612号