| 袁晓芳,徐青荣,高小夏,吴野环,郭 婧,缪金萍,楼碧文,郭佳琳,张 一.成年版发育性协调障碍问卷的信效度研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,2022,(10):1354~1359 |
| 成年版发育性协调障碍问卷的信效度研究 点此下载全文 |
| 袁晓芳 徐青荣 高小夏 吴野环 郭 婧 缪金萍 楼碧文 郭佳琳 张 一 |
| 常州市第一人民医院康复医学科，江苏省常州市，310000 |
| 基金项目：中以智能康复转化医学中心的建设资助项目（CZ20200033） |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2022.10.010 |
| 摘要点击次数: 788 |
| 全文下载次数: 536 |
| 摘要： |
| 摘要
目的：评估成年版发育性协调障碍问卷（adult developmental co-ordination disorders/dyspraxia checklist，ADC）的效度和信度，为临床推广及应用提供理论依据。
方法：对英文版ADC量表进行翻译汉化，招募580例卫生职业学校学生，用汉化后的ADC量表进行测验，完成填写后统计问卷得分，用内容效度、结构效度、内部一致性信度、分半信度、重测信度对测试结果进行评价。
结果：内容效度方面，除A1、B2、B3、B5、B7、B15外，成年版发育性协调障碍问卷各因子与总分的相关系数在0.301—0.60之间（P＜0.05），两个分项与总分的相关系数在0.791—0.973之间，具有良好的内容效度；采用验证性因子分析，提取公因子8个，累计方差贡献率为50.97%，各条目在相应因子的因子载荷均＞0.5，结构效度良好。成年版发育性协调障碍问卷的Cronbach α系数为0.860，内部一致性信度高，分半信度为0.619，分半信度良好；重测ICC系数0.324—0.909之间，重测信度良好。
结论：成年版发育性协调障碍问卷是一份具有良好效度和较好信度的测评工具。ADC可用于发现成年发育性协调障碍（developmental coordination disorder， DCD）疾病及运动协调能力的筛查，也可应用于DCD大规模流行病学调查。 |
| 关键词：发育性协调障碍问卷 信度 效度 发育性协调障碍 |
| The reliability and validity study of adult developmental co-ordination disorders/dyspraxia checklist Download Fulltext |
|
| The First People's Hospital of Changzhou， Changzhou，Jiangsu，310000 |
| Fund Project: |
| Abstract: |
| Abstract
Objective：To evaluate the validity and reliability of adult developmental co-ordination disorders/dyspraxia checklist （ADC） in adolescents and to provide a theoretical basis for clinical promotion and application.
Method：The English ADC was translated into Chinese， and 580 middle school students were recruited and tested by the Chinese ADC scale. The score of the questionnaire was counted after testing， and the test results were evaluated by structural and content validity， internal and retest reliability and split half reliability.
Result：Except for the A1、B2、B3、B5、B7、B15， the correlation coefficient between the factors and the total score evaluation scale ranged from 0.301—0.60 （P<0.05）， and the correlation coefficient between the three sub-items and the total score ranged from0.791—0.973，showing good content validity. Eight common factors were extracted by confirmatory factor analysis， and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 50.97%. The factor load of each item in the corresponding factor was >0.5， and the structural validity was good. Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.860，indicating good reliability of internal consistency. The fractional reliability was 0.619，and the fractional reliability was good. The retest ICC ranged from 0.324—0.909， and the retest reliability was good.
Conclusion：Adult developmental co-ordination disorders/dyspraxia checklist is an assessment tool with good validity and reliability. ADC can be used to detect adult DCD diseases and screen motor coordination ability， and also can be used in large-scale epidemiological investigation of DCD. |
| Keywords:adult developmental co-ordination disorders/dyspraxia checklist reliability validity developmental coordination disorder |
|
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 |
