| 欧阳增强,周雪莲,陈吉保,王 岩,袁雅欣,罗晓铭,杨晓鑫,姚加佳.转移评估量表3.0版汉化及信度和效度研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,2023,(5):618~624 |
| 转移评估量表3.0版汉化及信度和效度研究 点此下载全文 |
| 欧阳增强 周雪莲 陈吉保 王 岩 袁雅欣 罗晓铭 杨晓鑫 姚加佳 |
上海市养志康复医院(上海市阳光康复中心)
，同济大学附属养志康复医院，上海市，201600 |
| 基金项目： |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2023.05.006 |
| 摘要点击次数: 519 |
| 全文下载次数: 477 |
| 摘要： |
| 摘要
目的：探讨中文版转移评估量表（transfer assessment instrument，TAI）3.0评定轮椅使用者转移功能的信度及效度，为该量表的临床使用提供客观依据。
方法：经原量表作者同意，对TAI3.0进行汉化，过程遵循目前国际通行的翻译、逆向翻译、文化调适、预试验的程序，译制及修订量表。本研究纳入30例受试者，进行TAI3.0、VAS的评估，并在一周后完成第二次TAI3.0的评定。收集的数据使用Excel软件建立数据库，经核查后使用SPSS23.0统计软件进行分析，通过采用Pearson相关分析、可靠性分析、描述性统计分析和探索性分析。
结果：TAI3.0的内部一致性Cronbach α系数为0.709，95%置信区间在0.615—0.789（P<0.01）。TAI3.0的重测信度组内相关系数（ICC）为0.777，95%置信区间在0.536—0.894（P<0.01），评估者间ICC为0.917，95%置信区间在0.766—0.965（P<0.01）；TAI3.0与VAS的标准效度为r=0.604。13.33%的受试者得分落在最高分，3.33%的受试者得分落在最低分。
结论：中文版TAI3.0具有较好的信效度，无地板或天花板效应，适用于以中文为母语的治疗师评估轮椅使用者的转移能力。 |
| 关键词：轮椅使用者 转移 信度 效度 |
| Reliability and validity of transfer assessment instrument 3.0 in Chinese Download Fulltext |
|
Shanghai Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital ( Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center)
，Tongji University School of Medicine， Shanghai， 201600 |
| Fund Project: |
| Abstract: |
| Abstract
Objective： To explore the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of TAI3.0 in assessing the transfer function of wheelchair users， and to provide objective basis for the clinical use of this scale.
Method： With the consent of the author of the original scale， the TAI3.0 was translated into Chinese， following the current international procedures of translation， reverse translation， cultural adaptation and pilot experiment. In this study， 30 subjects were included for assessment of TAI3.0 and VAS， and the second TAI3.0 assessment was completed one week later. The collected data were analyzed by SPSS23.0 statistical software after verification. Pearson correlation analysis， reliability analysis， descriptive statistical analysis and exploratory analysis were conducted.
Result： The internal consistency of TAI3.0 was measured by using Cronbach's α and the coefficient was 0.709 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.615—0.789 (P<0.01). The intra group correlation coefficient (ICC) of test-retest reliability of TAI3.0 was 0.777， 95% confidence interval was 0.536—0.894 (P<0.01)， and the interrater ICC was 0.917， 95% confidence interval was 0.766—0.965 (P<0.01)； The standard validity of TAI3.0 and VAS was (r=0.604). 13.33% of the subjects scored the highest， and 3.33% of the subjects scored the lowest.
Conclusion： TAI 3.0 has good reliability and validity， and has no floor or ceiling effect in the study. It is suitable for Chinese speaking therapists to evaluate the transfer ability of Chinese wheelchair users. |
| Keywords:wheelchair users transfer reliability validity |
|
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 |
